<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Right Click, Copy and Paste</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newmediapolicy.org/2009/08/click-copy-paste/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newmediapolicy.org/2009/08/click-copy-paste/</link>
	<description>Emerging Policy for Emerging Technologies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 18:26:25 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: joe smith</title>
		<link>http://www.newmediapolicy.org/2009/08/click-copy-paste/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>joe smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 19:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newmediapolicy.org/?p=74#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Photographic works or personal images are not to be used without consent. if you put those pieces of work or images in a public setting that is not policed then you are running the risk of misuse. however if anyone wants any kind of privacy on social networking sites then they need to have a bit of security to there images. i for one would not want photos of a vegas vacation to end up on some random persons blog about the &quot;irresponsible in vegas&quot; or some other type of work. only to have the article be read by a co-worker or family member. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;if we are going to truly use these sites to show our selected friends what we do we need to be able to ensure they are not allowed to take those images and do whatever they feel with them. in the end its the new digital image plagiarizing that will in the end prevent people from using digital media to its fullest extents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Photographic works or personal images are not to be used without consent. if you put those pieces of work or images in a public setting that is not policed then you are running the risk of misuse. however if anyone wants any kind of privacy on social networking sites then they need to have a bit of security to there images. i for one would not want photos of a vegas vacation to end up on some random persons blog about the &#8220;irresponsible in vegas&#8221; or some other type of work. only to have the article be read by a co-worker or family member. </p>
<p>if we are going to truly use these sites to show our selected friends what we do we need to be able to ensure they are not allowed to take those images and do whatever they feel with them. in the end its the new digital image plagiarizing that will in the end prevent people from using digital media to its fullest extents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
